Search for: "Vegas Sports Information Network, LLC"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 1:03 pm
& DATE FINAL FOUR Association services, namely, conducting annual basketball tournaments at the college level 1,488,836; May 17, 1988 FINAL FOUR Promoting the goods and services of others by allowing sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with collegiate championship tournaments 2,377,720; Aug. 15, 2000 FINAL FOUR Printed matter, namely, guides in the field of sports; Luggage, namely, portfolios, backpacks, duffle bags, rolling luggage, garment bags, briefcases, athletic bags… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
Las Vegas-based Zuffa LLC (“Zuffa”), the company which owns the marks THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP and UFC in connection with mixed-martial arts competitions, filed an in rem lawsuit in the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm
., Appalachian School of LawSenior Editor, APPALACHIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LAW JOURNAL (recipient of “Exceptional Service Award” for outstanding performance)President and Chief of Executive Board, Environmental Law SocietyTreasurer and Community Liaison, Executive Board, Sport and Entertainment Law SocietyB.S., Sports Management w/concentration in Professional Sport Management and Minor in Business Law, Western Carolina UniversityProfessional experience includes:… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
DuoProSS Meditech Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Finds CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN primarily geographically descriptive of janitorial services: In re California Green Clean Development Company, LLC (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Caesars Palace – Caesars World files declaratory judgment action over OCTAVIUS TOWER against Octavius Tower LLC (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Christian Louboutin – Christian Louboutin: a (red) sole proprietor… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:18 am
Patent No. 7,690,991 owned by The Sporting Exchange Ltd. and entitled BETTING EXCHANGE SYSTEM. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:24 am
In its decision, the unanimous three-judge panel sided with all the major sports leagues and declared that the proposed expansion of Delaware's gaming would violate the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IP tango) Is football in Brazil a sport or a religion? [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC, No. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
Case Citation: Nursing CE Central, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False marking false marking false marking all at up to $500 per offense: Simonian v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False marking false marking false marking all at up to $500 per offense: Simonian v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
And AG Szpunar issued his opinion in The Pirate Bay case, advising the CJEU to answer the question posed by the Dutch Supreme Court of whether the Pirate Bay undertakes the act of communication to the public in the affirmative saying "the fact that the operator of a website makes it possible, by indexing them and providing a search engine, to find files containing works protected by copyright which are offered for sharing on a peer-to-peer network, constitutes a communication to… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
Based on EPA’s inspection and available information about the operation of the facility, EPA has determined that the facility has not satisfied Clean Air Act requirements that are designed to help prevent accidental releases and minimize the consequences of releases that do occur. [read post]
